Radiometric dating of rock strata petrie sequence dating
Uniformitarian geologists consider this form of dating strong evidence that the Earth is billions of years old.
But new research by creationists has revealed a large number of problems with radiometric dating.
The importance of the Moon in studying the principles of geology is that it provides an insight into the basic mechanics of planetary evolution and events that occurred early in the solar system.
Much of the knowledge we have of how planets are born and of the events that transpired during the early part of their histories has been gained from studies of the Moon.
We now have over 380 kg of rocks from nine places on the Moon, rocks that have been analyzed by hundreds of scientists from many different countries.
Data from a variety of experiments have revealed much about the Moon's deep interior.
Most scientists and many Christians believe that the radiometric dating methods prove that the earth is 4.5 billion years old.
The textbooks speak of the radiometric dating techniques, and the dates themselves, as factual information.
For example, in the The decay constant has dimensions of reciprocal seconds.
b - is incorrect because radiometric dating can not be used to date fossils directly c - is incorrect because the parent isotope decays to the daughter isotope d - is incorrect because radiometric dating works just fine on rocks billions of years old, eg K/Ar e - is incorrect because a perfectly errorless determination in science is a rare thing.
Radiometric dating utilizes the decay rates of certain radioactive atoms to date rocks or artifacts.
Older periods which predate the reliable fossil record are defined by absolute age.
Each era on the scale is separated by a major and/or changing event.**If the images and/or text on any of the web pages do not appear evenly spaced and centered on your screen, which commonly occurs with AOL pages, maximize the individual page's window.