Creationist radiocarbon dating

Rated 4.15/5 based on 779 customer reviews

So, we have a “clock” which starts ticking the moment something dies.

Obviously, this works only for things which were once living.

The topic of radiometric dating has received some of the most vicious attacks by young earth creation science theorists.

However, none of the criticisms of young earth creationists have any scientific merit.

C) dating usually want to know about the radiometric[1] dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years.

But, as is clear even from the very brief discussion in the previous paragraph, radiocarbon dating can say nothing one way or the other about whether the earth is many millions of years old, since such dates are far beyond this method's range of resolution.There is no conflict between science and the Bible..one needs is a proper understanding how to merge science and the Bible. Climate records from a Japanese lake are set to improve the accuracy of the dating technique, which could help to shed light on archaeological mysteries such as why Neanderthals became extinct.Thus creationists and others who invoke perceived weaknesses in radiocarbon dating as justification to cast doubt on the great age of the earth are either uniformed on very basic scientific facts, or else are highly being disingenuous to their audience.Radiocarbon dating has been studied at great length over the past few decades, and its strengths and weaknesses are very well understood at this point in time.

Leave a Reply